Amflow TL and PR: Same 800 Watt-Hours, 172 km and 158 km

On 26 October 2026 Amflow said the TL Carbon, its first SUV-style bike, was on sale, and that the PR Carbon and PR Carbon Pro were now on sale in the United States. The release prices are $3,899 and €3,499 for the TL, $4,999 and €4,499 for the PR Carbon, and $6,799 and €5,899 for the PR Carbon Pro. A product page this desk opened the same day showed a $3,899 tile and, beside it, a €3,899 deliver-to tile. That euro figure is not the German price in the release. Read the flag. All three bikes are built around a removable 800 Wh pack. The TL's range sentence is 172 km. The PR's is 158 km. The test recipe under both footnotes is the same. This is a reading of those pages. It is not a SickEBike ride.

Three bikes, one pack size

One laboratory, fourteen kilometers apart

The TL footnote is a flat paved road, an 80 kg rider, Eco mode, 65 rpm, and 21 km/h. Eighty kilograms is 176 pounds. Twenty-one kilometers an hour is 13.0 mph. One hundred seventy-two kilometers at that speed is 8.2 hours. The PR footnote is the same sentence with the bike's name changed, and the result is 158 km. The difference is 14 km, about 8 percent. It is not a trail loop, and it is not two labs you can average. A 600 Wh TL pack is listed at 124 km. Six hundred divided by 124 is 4.84 watt-hours a kilometer, thirstier than the 800 Wh claim. A 480 Wh second pack is listed at up to 100 km. Adding 172 and 100 makes 272. Amflow does not print 272. It prints 1,280 Wh. The range guide is why an Eco lap at 13 mph does not survive a 160 mm trail bike in a higher mode.

Same 800 watt-hours, same 80-kilogram rider, same 21 km/h Eco lap. The TL prints 172 km. The PR prints 158. Fourteen kilometers is the bike, not a second laboratory.

Eleven hundred watts is a news note, not a spec cell

The June 23 Shenzhen note says the TL's M2 makes 125 Nm and 1,100 W of peak, at a claimed 45 dBA, and that the rated power is 250 W. The Netherlands footnote repeats the 1,100 and the 250, and it says those figures apply to the TL Carbon only. The US spec table prints nominal 110 Nm and peak 125 Nm, a 4 A charger at 168 W, and no watt for the motor. One hundred sixty-eight divided by 4 is 42 volts, which is the arithmetic of the charger line, not a printed pack voltage. Eight hundred watt-hours divided by 168 watts is 4.8 hours if the charger never tapered. The table does not print a charge time. One hundred twenty-five divided by 110 is 14 percent more torque than the nominal, on the TL and on the non-Pro PR. The Pro's 150 against the PR's 125 is 20 percent. The motors guide is why a nominal newton-meter and a peak watt are not the same sentence.

The drive unit on the TL buy page weighs 2.65 kg. The new Bosch Active Line Plus is 2.7 kg, 50 grams more, with a 60 Nm peak and a 600 W peak that did not rise. Dividing 1,100 by 2.65 gives 415 watts a kilogram. Dividing Bosch's 600 by 2.7 gives 222. Those are divisions of brochure cells, not a dyno, and the TL footnote says the 1,100 applies to the TL only. The federal low-speed bicycle, 15 U.S.C. § 2085, is pedals, a motor of less than 750 watts, and less than 20 mph on the motor alone. Eleven hundred is not less than 750. Two hundred fifty is. The statute does not say peak or rated. Amflow's spec table prints neither, and it does not print a class. Electrek's 26 October piece called the bikes Class 1, no throttle, 20 mph, and typically unlockable to 28. This desk did not find a 20 mph line, or an unlock, on the Amflow pages it opened.

22.6 kilograms is an M-size, before the rack the story is about

The product page says a 2.9 kg carbon frame and a complete bike of 22.6 kg. Twenty-two point six kilograms is 49.8 pounds, which is the US marketing figure. Footnote 2 says that 22.6 is an M-size complete bike, and that lights, pedals, mudguards, a rear rack, and a kickstand can change it. The SUV pitch is the rack. The light number is the bike the footnote allows to be missing that rack. Two hundred kilograms of total load, bike plus rider plus front and rear racks, is 441 pounds. Subtract the 22.6 kg bike and 177 kg remains for the person and the bags, and less than that once the rack is actually on the bike. The page does not split rider and cargo into two certified maximums. The brake guide is why a 180 mm rotor on that load is a diameter, not a stopping distance. The PR's 203 mm rotor is a different diameter on a bike whose weight Amflow's spec table does not print.

The TL geometry table has four columns and two frames. S and M share a 375.3 mm reach. L and XL share 412.7 mm. The jump is 37.4 mm. Cranks are 155 mm on S/M and 160 mm on L/XL. The frame line says the bike is compatible with 27.5 and 29 inch wheels. The wheel in the spec is 27.5. The PR page says 40 geometry configurations, and the asterisk does the multiplication: 5 headset angles, 2 bottom-bracket heights, and 4 chainstay lengths. Five times two times four is 40. The same asterisk says that is theoretical, and that the usable range is whatever the bike actually allows. Chainstay cells already print 440 and 452 mm. Bottom-bracket drop already prints 10.4 and 24.5 mm. Those pairs are on the page. The other combinations are the asterisk.

The public review calls the TL an M2-S

Which card to buy

Buy the TL if the card in front of you still says M2, 125 Nm, 800 Wh, 120 mm, and a rack, and if you already know 172 km was Eco at 13 mph. Buy the PR if you want the same torque numbers on a 160 mm bike with a Transmission and a 203 mm rotor, and if 158 km on that same Eco lap is the range you are willing to start from. Buy the Pro only if the card says M2S and 150 Nm, not because a September review put an S on the TL. Skip 1,100 watts until it is on the spec table for the bike you are paying for. Skip 272 km. Skip a €3,899 tile when the release says €3,499. The e-MTB guide is the rest of the trail shelf. This desk did not ride them.