ReBake Abler: 4 kWh and 160 km Is 25 Wh/km

The ReBake Abler is a utility motorcycle from a new Swedish company, shown at EICMA on 3 November 2026. It is not a CAKE, and it is not a Class 1, 2, or 3 bicycle. Karl Ytterborn, the founder, was at CAKE from 2016 through 2024. The machine on the stand is a 42 mm aluminum tube frame, a rear hub with no reduction gear, and removable 2 kWh LFP packs. There are two homologations. The Abler45 is EU L1e-B, capped at 45 km/h, which is 28 mph, with a 4 kW nominal motor and a 5.12 kW peak. It starts at €3,990 including VAT and ships with one pack. The Abler80 is L3e-A1, over 80 km/h, 6.14 kW nominal, 7.68 kW peak, from €4,990, and it ships with two packs.

The second pack doubles the claim, exactly

One pack is 2 kWh, which is 2,000 watt-hours. Two packs are 4,000. The 45's city claim is 80 km on one pack and 160 km on two. One hundred sixty divided by 80 is 2. The faster claim is 60 km and 120 km. Same ratio. The 80 is 57 km and 114 km in the city, and 49 km and 98 km at the faster pace. One hundred fourteen divided by 57 is 2. Ninety-eight divided by 49 is 2. The second pack does not change the claimed watt-hours per kilometer. It doubles the kilometers. That is a linear sentence. thepack's own footnote says the real kilometer also depends on pace, surface, temperature, tire pressure, and load. A footnote that says the world varies, next to a table that doubles to the kilometer, is not a second test.

Four thousand watt-hours divided by 160 km is 25 watt-hours a kilometer. The 80's city claim, on the same 4 kWh, is 35.1. That is 40 percent more energy per kilometer, not a longer ride.

One hundred sixty kilometers is 99.4 miles. Electrek prints 99. One hundred fourteen kilometers is 70.8 miles. Electrek prints 71. Those are conversions, not a third range. Thirty-five point one divided by 25 is 1.40. The faster class spends more of the same tank per kilometer, which is why 4 kWh is 160 km on the 45 and 114 km on the 80. Do not average them into 137.

5.12 kW is the table. 5.8 kW is the box.

Five point one two divided by 4 is 1.28. The 45's peak sits 28 percent over its nominal. Seven point six eight divided by 6.14 is 1.25. The 80's peak sits 25 percent over its nominal. Seven point six eight divided by 5.12 is 1.5 exactly, so the two peaks are a clean step. Six point one four divided by 4 is 1.535, so the two nominals are not the same step. An Italian writeup rounded 5.12 to 5.1 and 6.14 to 6.1. Those are one-decimal roundings. The box in the photograph is not. It says 5.8 kW. Five point eight is not 5.12, and it is not 4. This desk is not averaging them into 5.5.

An L1e-B continuous cap is 4 kW and 45 km/h. The 45's nominal sits on that cap. The 5.12 kW peak is a peak, not a second homologation. An A1 continuous cap is 11 kW. Seven point six eight divided by 11 is 0.70, so the 80's peak is 70 percent of that ceiling. It is still a light motorcycle, not a bicycle. Four thousand watts is already more than 750. There are no pedals. The class chart does not care that 45 km/h happens to be 28 mph.

Four hours is 500 watts, if the clock is constant

thepack's charge cell is per battery, on a 230-volt outlet: 0 to 100 percent in 4 hours, and 0 to 80 percent in 3 hours. Two thousand watt-hours divided by 4 hours is 500 watts, if the charger held one rate the whole way. Eighty percent of 2,000 is 1,600 watt-hours. One thousand six hundred divided by 3 hours is 533 watts. A linear 4-hour fill would put 80 percent at 3.2 hours. They printed 3. The first 80 percent is 0.2 hours ahead of a straight line, which is what a taper looks like, and they did not print a charger watt. The sheet's nominal voltage is 51.2 volts. Two thousand divided by 51.2 is 39.1 amp-hours. That amp-hour is the arithmetic. It is not a printed cell count. Each pack is a claimed 17 kg, which Electrek writes as 37.5 pounds. The chassis without packs is 88.7 kg. Eighty-eight point seven plus 17 is 105.7 kg with one pack. Plus 34 is 122.7 kg with two. The battery page is why an LFP pack you can carry upstairs is a different object from a pack bolted in the NMAX E.

Two thousand full cycles to 80 percent capacity is the cell line. Two thousand divided by 365 is 5.5 years, if one full cycle is one day. That is not a warranty sentence until a warranty page says so. The €1,000 between €3,990 and €4,990 buys the higher class, the higher motor, and the second pack in the box. It is not a published price for a spare 2 kWh brick. The charging guide is the 230-volt outlet, not permission to read 4 hours as a driveway that started at zero. Their own cell says you rarely start at zero.

A 42 mm tube is not a payload

The frame spec is a 42 mm round aluminum tube, and the photographs put a rack on it. thepack's table does not print a kilogram of cargo. A tube diameter is not a load rating. The cargo guide is the page that asks for the printed payload before the groceries go on. Wheels are 14-inch cast. Front travel is 140 mm. Rear travel is 62 mm. Combined disc brakes, passive regen. No US price, and no on-sale month, on the pages this desk opened. The Honda EM1 e: is the other removable-pack scooter already filed here. Project Ventura is the other new street bike at this show, and that one did not print a pack at all.

No public ride film

This desk did not find a public ride video of the Abler. Search hits on the word rebake are a Blender baking tool, not this motorcycle. The photographs are studio and a foggy roadside still. Neither one is the 160 km claim. Buy the 45 if the license is a moped, you can live with 28 mph, and you have read that the 160 km line is two packs at 25 watt-hours a kilometer. Buy the 80 if you need over 80 km/h and you can spend the extra €1,000, which is a class and a second pack, not a measured range gain per kilowatt-hour. Skip both if you needed a bicycle path. This desk did not ride it.