Skip to content
Reviews · 9 min

Mokwheel Basalt ST 2.0: Everything You Need to Know

Step-through fat bike at $1,799.99 from $1,999.99. Hero chips say 750W, 90 Nm-plus, 940Wh, 28 mph, and 450 lb. A brand paragraph prints a 1,100W peak. A September 2025 scale read 82 lb against a 68 lb claim.

By SickEBike desk

The short answer

The Mokwheel Basalt ST 2.0 is a step-through fat bike at $1,799.99 from $1,999.99. Hero chips say 750 watts, 90 newton-meters plus, 940 watt-hours, 28 mph, and a 450-pound load. A collection paragraph calls the hub 750 watts continuous and 1,100 peak. Forty-eight times 19.6 is 940.8. A September 2025 test claimed 68 pounds, weighed 82, and put the step-through load at 350 pounds.

The Mokwheel Basalt ST 2.0 on the US product URL is a low-step fat bike, not the full-suspension sibling. The cart this crawl opened was $1,799.99 from $1,999.99. Hero chips say 750W and 90 Nm-plus, 940Wh, up to 80 miles, a 28 mph top, and a 450 lb payload, with a torque-plus-cadence sensor, 4.0-inch tires, hydraulic discs, and UL 2849 language. A collection card on the same brand adds 48V 19.6Ah, a 60–80 mile band, and Tektro HD-E350 brakes, still at a 450 lb effective load. Forty-eight times 19.6 is 940.8. The list row still says about $1,599. The row links here.

An olive step-through fat-tire bicycle on a gravel road at dusk
A low-step fat bike on a gravel road at dusk. Not a product photo, and not the full-suspension sibling.

1,100 peak on one paragraph, 1,300 on a table that is not this price

Hero chips, a solar-options paragraph, two 2025 reviews, and a compare grid priced like another bike. Not averaged.

What is printed
US cart and collectionSale $1,799.99 from $1,999.99. Chips: 750W and 90 Nm-plus, 940Wh, up to 80 miles, a 28 mph top, payload 450 lb, torque plus cadence, UL 2849. Collection card: 750W brushless, 48V 19.6Ah, 60 to 80 miles, Tektro HD-E350, 450 lb effective load. The solar-options paragraph says both the high-step and this low-step frame use a 750W continuous rear hub with a 1,100W peak and that same load rating. Inverter language is why that collection exists. It is not a second watt-hour on the hero.
ReviewsSeptember 19, 2025: 750W and an 1,100W peak, 90 Nm, 48V 19.6Ah written 940 Wh, claimed 60 to 80 miles, tested 37 to 63, claimed mass 68 lb, scale 82 lb with the pack, low-step load 350 lb, high-step 400 lb, thumb to 20 and pedal assist to 28, fork 110 mm, low-step 7-speed and high-step 8-speed, UL 2271 in the bullet. A March 31, 2025 card titled without the ST initials: $1,699, called Class 3, the same 1,100W peak and 90 Nm, 941 Wh, 80 lb, loops of 60 miles in minimum assist and 35 in maximum.
Not this cartA compare grid on the product URL is priced $3,299.99 from $3,499.99 and prints 750W with a 1,300W peak, 210 Nm-plus, 560 lb, 89 lb, a 135 mm fork, and 10-speed. A Florida shop sheet also prints a 1,300W peak and a 330 lb load, at $1,699.99 to $1,799.99. A Portland card prints the 1,100W peak, 941 Wh, and $1,799 from $1,899. A dealer technical block prints continuous 750W, peak 1,100W, 80 lb, and a 350 lb load at $1,899.99.

Do not average 1,100 and 1,300. The 1,300-watt, 210-newton-meter, 560-pound, 89-pound row sits next to a price this bike’s add-to-cart button does not show. Do not average 450, 350, 400, and 330. Do not average 68, 80, 82, and 89. Distance is up to 80, then a 60-to-80 band, then 37 to 63 on one test and 35 plus 60 on an earlier card that does not say low-step. Quote the assist and the frame.

The hero prints 750W, 940Wh, a 28 mph top, and 450 lb, and it does not print a peak. A brand paragraph prints a 1,100W peak. Forty-eight times 19.6 is 940.8. A $3,299.99 grid on the same URL is a different machine.

Who it is for

It is the low-step fat bike for a camp road and a grocery run, if you can stand a load line that moves and you know you did not click the full-suspension sibling. It is not the Mokwheel Obsidian. That one prints rated, continuous, and peak as three numbers, plus a review peak that is higher still, and it has a rear shock. A rear hub does not use the cassette the way a crank motor would. The hub versus mid-drive page is that split.

Pedals are on the bike. A 750-watt continuous figure is not under the federal less-than-750 line, and an 1,100-watt peak is further outside it. A 28 mph chip with no class word is not a sticker. The September review’s pair is a thumb to 20 and assist to 28. The class chart is why a menu cannot repair the watts. The watt-hour page is why 940, 940.8, and 941 are one multiplication, and why a 20-amp-hour sheet would not be. Buy the frame in the photo. Do not buy the $3,299.99 row and expect this fork.

Questions people ask

Why do 1,100 and 1,300 both show up?+

The solar-options paragraph and a September 19, 2025 review both print an 1,100-watt peak and 90 newton-meters. A Florida shop sheet prints 1,300. A compare grid on the product URL, priced at $3,299.99, also prints 1,300 watts, 210 newton-meters, 560 pounds, and 89 pounds. That grid is not this cart.

Is 940 watt-hours the same pack as 941?+

The hero prints 940. The replacement-pack page prints 940 for this series. Forty-eight times 19.6 is 940.8. A March 31, 2025 card prints 941. Those are one multiplication, rounded two ways. This crawl did not find a 20-amp-hour cell on this cart.

Which load and which scale?+

Hero and the collection both say 450 pounds. The September review says 350 on the step-through and 400 on the high-step, claimed mass 68, scale 82. A dealer card says 80 pounds and a 350-pound load. Another shop says 330. The March card says 80 pounds and does not say step-through.

Can you file it as Class 3?+

The hero prints 28 mph and no class word. The September review says a thumb to 20 and pedal assist to 28, and it calls that pair Class 2 and Class 3. Seven hundred fifty continuous is not under the federal less-than-750 line. The page says UL 2849. That review’s bullet says 2271.

Keep riding