Skip to content
Reviews · 8 min

Mokwheel Basalt ST 2.0 vs Obsidian

On the crawl, the hardtail’s sale price was higher than the full-suspension bike. Both are 48 volts and 19.6 amp-hours. The peaks are 1,100, 1,300, and a review’s 1,500. Do not average them.

By SickEBike desk

The short answer

The Mokwheel Basalt ST 2.0 is the low-step fat bike, $1,799.99 from $1,999.99. The Obsidian is full suspension, $1,699.99 from $2,199.99. Both are 48 volts and 19.6 amp-hours, 940.8 watt-hours. A Basalt paragraph prints a 1,100-watt peak. The Obsidian block prints 1,300. A review prints 1,500. On the sale tags the rear-shock bike was $100 less. Do not average the peaks.

The Mokwheel Basalt ST 2.0 and the Mokwheel Obsidian are both fat-tire hubs on a 48-volt, 19.6 amp-hour pack, and they are not the same bike. The Basalt ST 2.0 cart this desk opened was $1,799.99 from $1,999.99. It is the low-step bike with a front fork and no rear shock. The Obsidian cart was $1,699.99 from $2,199.99. It is the full-suspension bike. One thousand seven hundred ninety-nine dollars and ninety-nine cents minus one thousand six hundred ninety-nine dollars and ninety-nine cents is $100. On those two sale tags, the bike with the rear shock was the cheaper button. Two thousand one hundred ninety-nine dollars and ninety-nine cents minus one thousand nine hundred ninety-nine dollars and ninety-nine cents is $200. On the strike-through tags, the Obsidian is the dearer bike. Do not average the two gaps into one “about $150.” Pay the button you clicked.

Basalt rows are this desk’s ST 2.0 sheet. Obsidian rows are the full-suspension sheet. A $3,299.99 grid on the Basalt URL is not this bike. Peaks are not averaged.

Basalt ST 2.0Obsidian
Cart this crawl$1,799.99 from $1,999.99$1,699.99 from $2,199.99
ShockFront fork. A September 19, 2025 review prints 110 mm. No rear shock.Fork tile 130 mm of air. Electric Bike Report: rear shock 50 mm.
WattsHero: 750W, no peak. A brand paragraph: 750W continuous, 1,100W peak.Block: rated 750W, continuous 1,000W, peak 1,300W. A review peak: 1,500W.
Torque90 Nm-plus105 Nm-plus on the block. The review prints 105 Nm.
Pack48V 19.6Ah. Hero 940Wh. 48×19.6 is 940.8.48V 19.6Ah. The block prints no watt-hours. 48×19.6 is 940.8. A review prints 941.
Claimed milesHero up to 80. Collection card 60–80.Block 60–80. Hero tile up to 80.
A ridden pairSeptember 19, 2025: tested 37 to 63. That is a band, not two named modes.Electric Bike Report: 33.5 miles at PAS 5, 60.4 at PAS 1.
MassA claim of 68 lb. That review’s scale: 82 lb with the pack.Sheet 77 lb. One scale 81.3. Another sheet 83.4.
LoadHero 450 lb. The same review: low-step 350, high-step 400.560 lb
SpeedSeptember review: thumb to 20, pedal assist to 28.Block: throttle 20, pedal assist 28. Electric Bike Report calls it unclassified.

One thousand one hundred is not one thousand five hundred

The Basalt hero does not print a peak. A brand paragraph does: 750 watts continuous and 1,100 peak. The Obsidian block prints three words: 750 rated, 1,000 continuous, 1,300 peak. Electric Bike Report prints a fourth, 1,500, and calls the motor a rear hub. A Portland page titled Obsidian 2.0 says mid-drive. Do not average 1,100, 1,300, and 1,500. Do not let a shop’s mid-drive label rewrite the review. A $3,299.99 grid on the Basalt product URL prints a 1,300-watt peak and 210 newton-meters. That price is not the Basalt’s add-to-cart button. The motor page is why rated, continuous, and peak are three sentences. Seven hundred fifty is not under the federal “less than 750” line this desk keeps using. One thousand continuous is further outside it.

A full-suspension fat-tire bicycle on a rocky trail at dusk
The Obsidian. Air at the back. On the sale tags this desk opened, it was $100 less than the Basalt ST 2.0. The strike-through says the opposite.

Nine hundred forty point eight, twice

Forty-eight times 19.6 is 940.8 on both sheets. The Basalt hero already says 940. The Obsidian block does not print watt-hours, and a review prints 941. BikeRide’s detailed spec, already on the Obsidian page, prints 20 amp-hours and 960. That is a different product of a different amp-hour. Do not publish 950. The ridden miles are not one lab. Electric Bike Report’s Obsidian pair is 33.5 miles at PAS 5 and 60.4 at PAS 1. Nine hundred forty point eight divided by 33.5 is about 28.1 watt-hours a mile. Divided by 60.4 is about 15.6. The Basalt review’s 37 to 63 is a band. This desk will not divide a band and pretend it was Eco and Turbo. The watt-hour page is why the same cells can still die at different rates once a shock and a peak change.

The payload lines are 450 on the Basalt hero and 560 on the Obsidian. A review of the Basalt also prints 350 on the low-step and 400 on the high-step. Do not pick 450 because it sits in the middle.
BikeRide, published 23 July 2025. They are on the step-through full-suspension Obsidian, not a Basalt. The narrator says 1,000 watts, 105 newton-meters, and a 20 amp-hour pack. The US block this desk printed is 19.6 amp-hours. Do not average those.
Scootervergleich, published 14 November 2025. A Basalt-versus-Obsidian film, in German. This page does not take a watt, a price, or a mile from it. The dollars above are the US carts.

Which Mokwheel

Buy the Basalt ST 2.0 if you want the low step, you do not need a rear shock, and the button still says $1,799.99 from $1,999.99. Buy the Obsidian if you want the 130 mm fork and the rear shock, and you have read the watt block instead of the hero. A 28 mph assist line is not a class sticker. Electric Bike Report’s word for the Obsidian is unclassified. The Basalt page has the 82-pound scale. The Obsidian page has the four power numbers. The class chart is why a menu does not repair 1,000 watts continuous.

Questions people ask

Which Mokwheel was cheaper?+

On the sale tags this desk opened, the Obsidian was $1,699.99 and the Basalt ST 2.0 was $1,799.99. That is $100. The strike-through tags run the other way: $2,199.99 against $1,999.99, which is $200. Pay the button you clicked.

Do they use the same battery?+

Both print 48 volts and 19.6 amp-hours. Forty-eight times 19.6 is 940.8. The Basalt hero says 940 watt-hours. The Obsidian block does not print watt-hours. A review prints 941. A 20 amp-hour line is a different pack.

What is the motor difference?+

The Basalt paragraph prints 750 watts continuous and a 1,100-watt peak. The Obsidian block prints 750 rated, 1,000 continuous, and 1,300 peak. Electric Bike Report prints 1,500 peak and calls it a rear hub. A shop page says mid-drive. Do not average them.

Which one has a rear shock?+

The Obsidian. Electric Bike Report prints 50 mm at the rear and a 130 mm fork. The Basalt ST 2.0 is the low-step bike. A September 19, 2025 review prints a 110 mm fork and no rear shock.

Keep riding